|
The Logic of Life: Uncovering the New Economics of Everything | 
 enlarge | Author: Tim Harford
Publisher: Little, Brown
Category: Book
List Price: £18.99
Buy New: £6.81
You Save: £12.18 (64%)
New (24) Used (5) Collectible (1) from £6.00
Rating:  13 reviews
Sales Rank: 3945
Media: Hardcover
Pages: 288
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.3
Dimensions (in): 9.7 x 6.1 x 1.3
ISBN: 0316027561
EAN: 9780316027564
ASIN: 0316027561
Publication Date: January 25, 2008
Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
Condition: UK SELLER_IN STOCK_Immediate Dispatch _ Protective packing_ Tel 01908 584 386 Cover may vary
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 8 more reviews...
 Tim does it again! May 21, 2008
A. I. Mackenzie (Glasgow, Scotland.)
Tim Harford has again managed to write a book on Economics that I read in a weekend (well Thursday to Saturday, but weekends are stretchy!). Give that I've tried and failed to finish the Black Swan and wasn't really all that impressed with Freakonomics that's a pretty big recommendation.
In this book Harford dwells more on how cities can be more amenable to live in, rational prostitutes and race and sex roles. You can tell he's started a family since the last book as a lot of the topics focus on 'quality of life' issues.
Again underlying the book is that we make rational choices within our limitations and that we respond to incentives with surprising deftness. Other reviewers have been quite critical of this thesis but Harford defends it really well. He explains why if I go to a playgroup with my son why I'm likely to be one of the only men there, why cities end up segregated because of relatively mild preferences and why it's rational under certain circumstance for a prostitute not to use a condom (no really!).
I really enjoy these books, it's just a shame he doesn't write for the Independent (as I'd get to read his weekly column).
 Dr Pangloss rides again May 5, 2008
Chuck E (UK)
3 out of 7 found this review helpful
Hmmm... The whole edifice of classical economics is baed on the premise that individuals will always make rational choices based on their self-interest, to the ultimate benefit of society as a whole. Of course, anyone who takes the odd glance outside the study at the real world will be a bit nonplussed by this contention, because it appears as if many people make rather irrational choices, with some difficult implications for a theory that assumes the optimum allocation of resources.
It's the kind of 'heads I win, tails you lose' defence of market fundamentalism that looks increasinlgy threadbare in the post-LTCM, sub-prime world of market failure, as central bankers desperately try to shore up the capital markets in the wake of an excess of rationality. However, if you can show that all those 'irrational' choices are, in fact, perfectly rational, then the edifice survives intact and there is no need for reform - all is for the best in the best of possible worlds.
Dissaponting, but makes a good door stopper May 1, 2008
Laurence D. Greig
2 out of 6 found this review helpful
I have not read The Undercover Economist, and I certainly don't plan to after I've read this book, that is if it's as bland and obvious as the logic of life. I stuck with the book after 150pages then put it down feeling disappointed and conned after reading some of the reviews. I imagined that I'd be intellectually inspired or intrigued by some of the theories Harford postulates. Ocassionally, i let out a tiny grubble at some mildly interesting anecdotes. Overall, a book wholly committed to rationalising pretty much everything is fraile with limited attributes.
Boring !!
 Math Applied to Common Decisions April 23, 2008
Donald Mitchell (Boston)
1 out of 4 found this review helpful
Many of the popular books about economics seek to convince you that human beings are wildly illogical. Why? Because the dollars and sense of what people say and do don't always match up well. Tim Harford gets past that problem by mostly ignoring the academic studies that seem far removed from reality by emphasizing what people do when they are new to something.
The book is at its best when he's explaining how systemic biases can create large shifts in human behavior. For instance, a slight preference for having neighbors who are like oneself can lead to quite substantial segregation along race, religion, education, and economic lines.
For me, the book lacked any big "gotcha" like the finding that abortions may have contributed to lowering crime.
In almost every section, I thought that Mr. Harford was arguing (or at least haranguing) beyond the limits of his evidence.
When he moves beyond being an observer into someone trying to convince you what people are like, I found he was often offensive. There's a section about how those who aren't native to Africa "solved" the problem of dying from malaria by transferring slaves from Africa to milder climates that's insensitive at best.
To Mr. Harford's eye, we are so much creatures of economics, comfort, and the pursuit of gain that there's no role for any other human motives. That's a too limited view of people . . . and hardly an uplifting one.
Unless you are addicted to Mr. Harford's writing, skip this book. It won't tell you much that you need to know.
Math Applied to Common Decisions April 23, 2008
Donald Mitchell (Boston)
5 out of 5 found this review helpful
Many of the popular books about economics seek to convince you that human beings are wildly illogical. Why? Because the dollars and sense of what people say and do don't always match up well. Tim Harford gets past that problem by mostly ignoring the academic studies that seem far removed from reality by emphasizing what people do when they are new to something.
The book is at its best when he's explaining how systemic biases can create large shifts in human behavior. For instance, a slight preference for having neighbors who are like oneself can lead to quite substantial segregation along race, religion, education, and economic lines.
For me, the book lacked any big "gotcha" like the finding that abortions may have contributed to lowering crime.
In almost every section, I thought that Mr. Harford was arguing (or at least haranguing) beyond the limits of his evidence.
When he moves beyond being an observer into someone trying to convince you what people are like, I found he was often offensive. There's a section about how those who aren't native to Africa "solved" the problem of dying from malaria by transferring slaves from Africa to milder climates that's insensitive at best.
To Mr. Harford's eye, we are so much creatures of economics, comfort, and the pursuit of gain that there's no role for any other human motives. That's a too limited view of people . . . and hardly an uplifting one.
Unless you are addicted to Mr. Harford's writing, skip this book. It won't tell you much that you need to know.
|
|
|
www.pcprotech.co.uk | |
