|
QI: The Book of General Ignorance | 
 enlarge | Authors: John Lloyd, John Mitchinson
Creator: Stephen Fry
Publisher: Faber and Faber
Category: Book
List Price: £12.99
Buy Used: £0.80
You Save: £12.19 (94%)
New (46) Used (36) Collectible (1) from £0.80
Rating:  47 reviews
Sales Rank: 17
Media: Hardcover
Edition: TV Tie in Ed
Pages: 304
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.9
Dimensions (in): 7.8 x 5.2 x 1.1
ISBN: 0571233686
EAN: 9780571233687
ASIN: 0571233686
Publication Date: October 5, 2006
Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 42 more reviews...
 Well worth the money May 16, 2008
Jonathan Bond (Stoke-on-Trent, UK)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
A really fantastic book. You'll soon start to realise everything you thought you knew is wrong, and you'll end up telling all your friends and relatives all your new-found knowledge!
 fun, interesting trivia written in a clever and concise way April 4, 2008
B.
5 out of 5 found this review helpful
Fun facts for trivia fans. Having never seen the BBC series, I picked up The Book of General Ignorance based solely on a nice price and curiosity. It actually turned out to be quite a nice read. Lots of fun, interesting trivia written in a clever and concise way. Good stuff.
Intriguing and entertaining March 5, 2008
Farnborough Karl (Farnborough UK)
A great little pick up at any time book that will entertain anyone with an inquisitive mind. Thoroughly recommended.
 Excellent, flawed, insightful, ignorant, pedantic, sanctimoniously smug and fascinating! February 11, 2008
Rgh1066 (Monterrey)
4 out of 5 found this review helpful
I was given a copy of this for my birthday two months ago, and have had it by my bedside ever since. It is by turns excellent, flawed, insightful, ignorant, pedantic, sanctimoniously smug and fascinating!
Once you get past Stephen Fry's cringeworthy introduction; not his best piece of work although admittedly Fry's less-than-best is still better than most, you are left with a series of questions to which the authors anticipate you will guess an answer that they gleefully reveal as "wrong". This has been a staple of pub quizzes and history teachers' trick questions through the ages of course, and consequently all the usual suspects are here; Mauna Kea gets a mention, so does Nelson's "Kismet", the Irishness of the Duke of Wellington, Richard ap Meryk (here as Richard Ameryk) and Antarctica (as the driest place on earth - which depends entirely on whether you regard frozen water as still water or not)
Occasionally, the pedantry rebounds on the authors. They observe there are more tigers in the USA than any other country, which is true because they are commonly seen in zoos and private menageries. But elsewhere they tell us that there are no buffalo in North America, which isn't true at all (I saw one earlier this month in a local safari park). Either zoos count or they don't. Pedantry, to be effective, has to be uniformly applied, And people who claim that coffee beans are not really beans do not understand how language works. A computer mouse isn't a real mouse either.
Occasionally, the book gets caught out by the changing times. At time of writing a chihuahua is back again as the world's smallest dog, and the authors admit that the number of states of matter is an evolving number. This doesn't make what they have to say any less interesting, but it does challenge the book's status as a repository of knowledge.
I think part of the problem is that for most of the book it is spun as a fact booklet. "Everything you think you know is wrong" proclaims the book's cover. In the afterword, the authors claim that actually they don't claim to be quite right: they only want to be interesting. This cranks the pressure up and raises questions about some of the inclusions. Does the revelation that air is mostly nitrogen really belong here? Even the authors recognise that every twelve-year-old knows that.
My favourite gripe is the first question in the book. The authors claim that Henry VIII's annulled marriages cannot be counted and so he had only two wives, not six. It's a great story, but it's flawed. The claim rests entirely on a strict rendering of the term "annulled" in the legal paradigm. At the time Henry was married to any of his six wives, no one would have claimed the lucky girl was not his queen. To do so, indeed, would have been very foolish.
Very Good January 21, 2008
Colin O'Connor (Ireland)
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Excellent content but very little new material. Basically a script version of the TV series
|
|
|
www.pcprotech.co.uk | |
