| Subcategories | | Condition (condition-type) | | • | New | | • | Used |
|
|
|
|
Neuromancer | 
 enlarge | Author: William Gibson
Publisher: Voyager
Category: Book
List Price: £7.99
Buy New: £2.72
You Save: £5.27 (66%)
New (28) Used (16) from £2.22
Rating:  52 reviews
Sales Rank: 1593
Media: Paperback
Edition: New Ed
Pages: 320
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.5
Dimensions (in): 7.6 x 5.1 x 1
ISBN: 0006480411
Dewey Decimal Number: 813
EAN: 9780006480419
ASIN: 0006480411
Publication Date: November 27, 1995
Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: Like New, never read, may have small remainder mark - Ships from Canada by Air Mail, Delivery within 2 to 3 weeks, 100% Satisfaction Guarantee! Over 150,000 Amazon.co.uk orders filled
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.co.uk Review
Case was the best interface cowboy who ever ran in Earth's computer matrix. Then he double- crossed the wrong people.… Winner of the Hugo, Nebula and Philip K. Dick Awards.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 47 more reviews...
 Someone to Wachowski me December 30, 2007
Mr. O. Buxton (Highgate, UK)
4 out of 4 found this review helpful
I have mixed feelings about neuromancer: one one hand, circa 1982 it was such a staggering imaginative feat, conjuring up a breathtakingly close intellectual equivalent to the internet, coining the term and then strikingly predicting the commercialisation of "cyberspace" and it is also such a valiant stylistic effort, amalgamating Chandler's gumshoe noir with Dick's post-modern dystopian sci-fi that you can't help but be totally swept along.
On the other hand it is such a horror-show of a literary artefact, on a technical level so poorly conceived and executed, that it is almost impossible to slog through.
But slog through it I did, after a couple of aborted runs at it, and while I remain impressed at Gibson's conceptual prescience, thanks to his needlessly affected, sub-Burroughs, Beat-for-the-hell-of-it writing style I often had little idea what was going on, much less why, and from my tenuous grasp of the plot, conceptual scheme and literary motivations can't for the life of me fathom what Gibson was trying to make from his portentous ending. The thing is, and unlike many substandard novels of this type, I suspect Gibson did have a coherent point, but he buried under such a thick coating of cod-style it remains forever concealed. In his afterword he pretty much concedes all this (and handily summarises the ending in about two lines!).
There is a real art to successful stylism, evident in someone like James Ellroy whose prose, even though initially forbidding, suddenly "clicks" and carries the reader along enhancing the impression, the images, and the comprehension. Gibson's style, whilst cool, is uneven, obscure, and never manages anything other than to get in the way of a (fairly) good story.
Only fairly good: there are far too many characters, most are introduced arbitrarily and fulfil no particular function other than building the dystopian atmosphere, and even the five or six main ones are poorly drawn, wafer thin, and appear to prescribe little by way of developmental arc (Case, I think, does, but thanks to the vapid style I couldn't tell you what it was).
Reading Neuromancer in the age of the internet puts the story at another disadvantage: we now have the actual internet to compare Gibson's matrix with, and while it is undoubtedly a remarkable previsualistion in many respects, it diverges utterly in others, to the point where it is difficult now to imagine the universe Gibson paints for us.
Hardly Gibson's fault, of course, but an internet arranged in a fixed three-dimensional space seems quaint and fairly pointless when the internet we do know and love is constructed for its infinite flexibility and re-orderability - the data is just there, and you the user can use what tools you like to order and navigate it to your convenience.
They're apparently making a film of Neuromancer: I couldn't help thinking good luck; rather them than me - not only do they have to pare down and disentangle Gibson's contorted prose and plotting, they have to do it more convincingly that the Wachowski brothers did: Their Matrix franchise owes almost as much to Neuromancer as Blade Runner did to Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?, and the bits that are different are all marked improvements.
Then again, Neuromancer was a first novel, and on that count alone it is pretty extraordinary.
Olly Buxton
 The alpha and omega of cyberpunk October 23, 2007
turner
1 out of 3 found this review helpful
In there beginning the was case, and wintermute saw case and it was good...
The alpha and omega of cyberpunk. This novel was a watershed, any novel of the genre that followed could not helped but be shaped by this superb book. Almost lyrical in style I can remember the moment I first cracked it's spine.
SF Noir...Poetic DreamScapes of a Dystopic Future... September 27, 2007
NeuroSplicer (Freeside, in Orbit)
3 out of 4 found this review helpful
I have read this masterpiece (together with the other two of the Sprawl series: COUNT ZERO and MONA LISA OVERDRIVE) during my university years, about a decade ago. Since then I have re-read it countless times. Even reading only some pages brings up powerful imagery, dark poetic language, unforgettable prose...
The strength of William Gibson, demonstrated here in full colors, is his ability to create the atmosphere and placing the reader in the middle of things. After reading these books of his, one has the feeling of actually having lived in the Sprawl in a past life!
Start with this one. Then COUNT ZERO. And finally MONA LISA OVERDRIVE.
A Masterpiece Trilogy!!! Own them all!!!
I had to read this book in English class June 2, 2007
unknown (UK)
4 out of 6 found this review helpful
A fabulous read and a perfect masterpiece. I have read all of William Gibsons books. Some of his books inspired me to take on Computer Science and artificial intelligence, in particular, at university.
I would advise anyone that has an interest in science fiction, the internet, or anyone else to give it a read. It's a digital cowboy sort of novel which may take a while to gather thoughts from chapter to chapter, but if you are a keen reader you will come to grips with the complex storyline and the sheer simplicity with which it is written.
A science fiction masterwork April 16, 2007
Andrew Dalby (oxford)
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
This is one of the most important books of the genre. Yes he got some things wrong - like the cost of Ram (but so did Bill Gates).
The book is something totally new and definitive. It lets you see the dark underside of a internet world. While there are flavours of Metropolis, describing how we deal with human computer interaction, it is mainly a thriller in a technological world.
|
|
|
www.pcprotech.co.uk | |
