|
Gods And Generals / Gettysburg [2003] | ![Gods And Generals / Gettysburg [2003]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41ZR3FV2SWL._SL160_.jpg)
 enlarge | Director: Ronald F. Maxwell
Actors: Tom Berenger, Martin Sheen, Stephen Lang, Robert Duvall, Jeff Daniels
Studio: Warner Home Video
Category: DVD
List Price: £30.99
Buy New: £5.98
You Save: £25.01 (81%)
New (14) Used (3) from £4.99
Rating:  5 reviews
Sales Rank: 4789
Format: Pal
Language: English (Original Language)
Rating: Suitable for 12 years and over
Region: 2
Discs: 2
Number Of Items: 2
Running Time: 452 Minutes
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.6
Dimensions (in): 7.6 x 5.5 x 1.3
EAN: 7321900046336
ASIN: B0002HSDDC
Theatrical Release Date: February 21, 2003
Release Date: July 5, 2004
Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Customer Reviews:
 A View from the Confederacy December 21, 2007
P.B.I.
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Granted that both these Films are made from the Confederacy point of view,i feel that they had to be made to redress the bias shown by Hollywood over the years to the Noble Nothern Cause,with Films like Glory,The Red Badge of Courage,and numerous assorted other B Movies that show the Confederate Soldier as some country Hick,when in fact these so called Ragged Hicks routed the Union Army in Numerous Battles.Big Budget these Films are not,Sentimental in places.for sure,but never the less they provide an insight into a Turbulent Period of American History.I must Add that Robert Duvall as Gen.Robert E.Lee is simply Mesmerising.I for one think this Double boxed set presents real value for Money.
 Worth it for Gettysburg alone December 12, 2007
Trevor Willsmer (London, England)
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
Ironies abound: while Gettysburg was made for television but ended up with a theatrical release, yet despite a $60m budget, a huge cast and being shot in 2.35:1 widescreen, Gods and Generals looks like it would have been more at home on TV. In some ways it's almost the most expensive home movie ever shot, with Ted Turner paying for this account of the early years of the American Civil War out of his own pocket. For the first hour it's almost as if the Union never existed, the film shown entirely from the Southern side, and with a very partisan view at that (all down to Yankee aggression, with Fort Sumpter conveniently dismissed in a single line). Too often lengthy quotations take the place of dialogue and even the better actors in the cast often seem ill at ease while the surprisingly weak daylight photography and poor CGi matte painting in early scenes giving it an air of storybook unreality. Indeed, Ronald Maxwell's approach at times seems pure D.W. Griffith, with a fondness for awkward tableaux and unconvincing sentiment (poor Mira Sorvino gets a couple of particularly painfully hearts-and-flowers scenes to deliver as a consolation prize for missing out on playing Joan of Arc when Maxwell's version was dropped in the wake of Luc Besson's film). There are a few moments here and there - an intimate scene between Stonewall Jackson and his wife confiding his doubts, a scene between Jeff Daniels and Kevin Conway's sergeant about friends on the other side - but as the over-ambitious film tries to cram too much history into its four hour running time (and still scenes filmed dealing with Lincoln, John Wilkes Booth and the Battle of Antietem didn't make the cut) the people just get lost.
Thankfully, the second half rallies considerably as the film reaches the Battle of Fredericksburg and the 20th Maine's disastrous charge, and the contradictions in Stephen Lang's "Stonewall" Jackson, a deeply religious man yet one who advocated taking no prisoners, become more interesting despite the film's determination to turn him into across between Jesus Christ and a vengeful Old Testament prophet. Yet sadly the lasting impression is of a film that is too sprawling and unfocussed for its own good and one that not only either needed to be a lot longer or a lot shorter but also much better written. As for the somewhat nonsensical title, it's an abbreviation of the novel's Faith in Gods and Generals. Incidentally, be warned that the DVD has one of the worst side breaks ever. Some fairly decent DVD extras, but the lack of deleted scenes implies a director's cut may be in the offing some time in the future.
Gettysburg is actually the second part in an intended trilogy that will now probably never be completed in the wake of the dismal box-office for the bloated Gods and Generals. Thankfully it gains more by having a smaller canvas, focussing on one single battle and largely on three actions - Buford's inspired initial defense on the first day, Little Round Top and Pickett's Charge - and by seeing the action from the viewpoint of both sides throughout. The characters are better drawn, the dialogue feels more natural and you get much more of a sense of what a human tragedy the war was. As a British observer on the Confederate side points out, it all boils down to "same people, different dreams."
The problem with most epics devoted to single battles or campaigns (Waterloo, Zulu Dawn, The Battle of Neretva etc) is that without a single dominating personality they often get so bogged down with history or strategy that the human element gets lost, with a succession of stars acting almost like anonymous interchangeable sports commentators only there to explain what's going on for the layman. Gettysburg has its share of characters primarily there for exposition, but by narrowing its focus to a few of them and drawing on their own letters and memoirs it's able to give them a little more depth and personality. Martin Sheen's Lee's increasingly wrong-headed strategy as he consigns more and more men to pointless deaths with a homespun rationale that leads to horrifying casualties contrasts well with Tom Berenger's more cautious Longstreet gradually realising that the tide has turned against them while Jeff Daniels' awkward but sincere Lawrence Chamberlain gives a humane and decent voice to the Union's case. Richard Jordan is genuinely affecting in his last role - his final scene is even more moving with the knowledge that he really was dying at the time - and even George Lazenby even turns up briefly. As a result, there's more involvement in what's happening and more understanding of what's at stake on a personal level to both sides during the battle. Although shot as a TV miniseries before being released theatrically, it actually looks like a feature film, and one that manages to hold the interest over its four hour running time. It's such an impressive piece of work that you can't help but wonder why so many of the same people got it so wrong so often on Gods and Generals.
Excellent extras on the double-sided DVD, but sadly none of the deleted scenes from the 270-minute laserdisc director's cut.
 Deeply disappointing June 6, 2006
Bill Kelly (Liverpool, UK)
3 out of 6 found this review helpful
I agree with the reviewer below on the aspects of characteristaion and the overwhelming pro-South bias in this flawed prequel.
The constant harping of Jackson to God to bless his cause gets tedious in the extreme, with not even a dissenting note to lighten the burden. Very disappointing after the magnificence of Gettysburg, which presented both sides of the war in a more elqoquent and engaging tone.
important history August 7, 2005
16 out of 18 found this review helpful
The Civil War was the defining episode in American History - what it means to be American. This movie captures a real sense of the passions and horrors of the civil war. Dramatising such a story will always be hard - the Ken Burns documentary can never be beaten - but this film cycle is worth viewing. Its not big box office hollywood, but there again that's not the point. Some things people need to remember, and this is a chapter in Amercia's history that should not be forgotten.
A one-sided, poorly realized "prequel" to Gettysburg May 27, 2005
14 out of 25 found this review helpful
A "presquel" to the superative "Gettysburg" this plodding, one-sided meandering epic might well have been titled "The Stonewall Jackson Story". While the character of Jackson is thoroughly explored, many other major characters are not. Some, such as J.E.B. Stuart are given short shift, others none at all. The only Union leader given any background is Joshua Chamberlain. Well played by Jeff Daniels who carried the role in Gettysburg, Chamberlain is left mute by a question from one of his college students as to the validity of the Union cause. This beggars belief since the real Chamberlain was a Professor of Rhetoric at Bowdoin College at the time! Chamberlain makes a magnificent statement of the Union cause in Gettysburg when appealing to Maine deserters.
The movie does show, to a very limited degree, just how poorly the Army of the Potomac was led, compared to the Army of Northern Virginia. The debacle of Fredricksburg is shown in detail, but the cgi does not live up to the state of the art. In Gettysburg, there was only one, very brief, female speaking part. Here we are immersed in a mid Nineteenth Century soap opera, which bogs down the military aspects of the story to a degree as to make them seem superfolous.
Just as "Gettysburg" was based on the wonderful "The Killer Angels" written by Jeff Shaara, the father of Michael the author of "Gods and Generals", the former work is superior in every regard. The former is a tale of a single, crucial battle (and only 2/3 of that). The latter is the tale of the first half of the American Civil War, an affair far too grand in scope for even this mind-numbing movie.
|
|
|
www.pcprotech.co.uk | |
