Computer shop, Support, Computer Repair Tunbridge Wells - Shop
 Location:  Home» Sport & Leisure » All Action & Adventure » The Man Who Knew Too Much [1934] (NTSC)  
Categories
Books
DVD
Electronics
Health & Personal Care
Home & Garden
Kitchen
Music
Outdoor Living
Software
Toys
PC & Video Games
Jewellery
Sport & Leisure
Tools
Clothing
Baby
Subcategories
Classics
Children's
Comedy
Drama
Horror & Suspense
Musicals
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Silent
War and Westerns
Related Categories
• All Action & Adventure
Action & Adventure
Categories
DVD & VHS
Video
• All Crime, Thrillers & Mystery
Crime, Thrillers & Mystery
Categories
DVD & VHS
Video
• Alfred Hitchcock
Crime, Thrillers & Mystery
Categories
DVD & VHS
Video
• Classics
Categories
DVD & VHS
Video
• DVD
Format (binding_browse-bin)
Refinements
DVD & VHS
Video
• 1939 and earlier
Release Date (feature_three_browse-bin)
Refinements
DVD & VHS
Video
• Region 0
Region(feature_browse-bin)
Refinements
DVD & VHS
Video
• Standard Edition
Editions (feature_two_browse-bin)
Refinements
DVD & VHS
Video
• English
Language (theme_browse-bin)
Refinements
DVD & VHS
Video

The Man Who Knew Too Much [1934] (NTSC)

The Man Who Knew Too Much [1934] (NTSC)

enlarge enlarge 
Director: Alfred Hitchcock
Actors: Leslie Banks, Edna Best, Peter Lorre, Frank Vosper, Hugh Wakefield
Studio: Delta
Category: DVD

Buy New: £10.73



New (2) Used (3) from £1.28

Rating: 4.0 out of 5 stars 8 reviews
Sales Rank: 122952

Format: Black & White, Dvd-video, Ntsc, Special Edition
Languages: English (Original Language), Chinese (Subtitled), Japanese (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled)
Region: 0
Aspect Ratio: 1.33:1
DVD Layers: 1
DVD Sides: 1
Picture Format: Academy Ratio
Number Of Items: 1
Running Time: 75 Minutes
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 7.5 x 5.1 x 0.6

MPN: D82023D
UPC: 018111202336
EAN: 0018111202336
ASIN: B00000CQK0

Theatrical Release Date: March 22, 1935
Release Date: July 24, 1999
Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
Condition: **BRAND NEW** FACTORY SEALED. Please allow 7-15 business days for delivery. Ships by Airmail from New York. No VAT or extra charges. Excellent Customer Service. Email confirmation of order.#

Similar Items:

  • The 39 Steps [1935]
  • The Man Who Knew Too Much [1955]
  • Suspicion [1941]
  • Saboteur [1942]
  • Foreign Correspondent

Editorial Reviews:

Amazon.co.uk Review
Alfred Hitchcock himself called this 1934 British edition of his famous kidnapping story "the work of a talented amateur", while his 1956 Hollywood remake was the consummate act of a professional director. Be that as it may, this earlier movie still has its intense admirers who prefer it over the Jimmy Stewart--Doris Day version, and for some sound reasons. Tighter, wittier, more visually outrageous (back-screen projections of Swiss mountains, a whirly-facsimile of a fainting spell), the film even has a female protagonist (Edna Best in the mom part) unafraid to go after the bad guys herself with a gun. (Did Doris Day do that that? Uh-uh.) While the 1956 film has an intriguing undercurrent of unspoken tensions in nuclear family politics, the 1934 original has a crisp air of British optimism glummed up a bit when a married couple (Best and Leslie Banks) witness the murder of a spy and discover their daughter stolen away by the culprits. The chase leads to London and ultimately to the site of one of Hitch's most extraordinary pieces of suspense (though on this count, it must be said, the later version is superior). Take away distracting comparisons to the remake, and this Man Who Knew Too Much is a milestone in Hitchcock's early career. Peter Lorre makes his British debut as a scarred, scary villain. --Tom Keogh


Customer Reviews:   Read 3 more reviews...

2 out of 5 stars The remake is much better...   April 10, 2006
L. Davidson (Belfast, N.Ireland)
0 out of 2 found this review helpful

Well, you can see why Hitchcock remade this film twenty years later. This original version looks amateurish and dated ,with the remake vastly superior in all departments. The acting in this original is wooden and inexpressive , apart from Peter Lorre's star turn as a German villain, with the highlight of the film undoubtedly being the remarkable flying chair scene in the church, expertly choreographed by Hitchcock.It is a pity that hardly any of the numerous remakes churned out by Hollywood today expand and improve upon the original film in the way that Hitchcock did with this one.


5 out of 5 stars Second (Edna) Best   March 26, 2006
Sandra Shevey
2 out of 7 found this review helpful

Hitch always said, and said it to me, that this version of the film was a `dry run` for the 1956 version.

And the difference between the two is what separates British and American Hitchcocks.

The British version is a taut, tense spy thriller. True. And a darn good one too.

But the American version is a psycho-sexual-political thriller with enough anti-Americanisms to enrage HUAC if it hadn`t been so busy looking for communists at home.

The second version is one of the most cunning pieces of filmmaking I have ever seen, and one of the most colossal. I spoke about why and how at the lecture which I gave at the Barbican in London last weekend.

I also talk about both versions (`two versions`-ha!) during the walk which I run in London profiling Hitchcock locations from `Frenzy`, `The Man Who Knew Too Much` (1956) and `The Paradine Case`.



4 out of 5 stars This classic thriller firmly established Hitchcock's fame   June 1, 2005
Daniel Jolley (Shelby, North Carolina USA)
10 out of 10 found this review helpful

It is hard to overstate the importance of this film, for The Man Who Knew Too Much catapulted Alfred Hitchcock into the ranks of the directing elite and did much to define the very genre of the suspense thriller. The fact that Hitchcock remade this 1934 film twenty-two years later should in no way be interpreted to mean that this original version is an inferior film. Hitchcock may have looked upon the original as the work of a "talented amateur," but critics and fans hail the film as a great success that showed the master truly coming into his own - thanks in no small part to his being given almost complete control of the project.

The Man Who Knew Too Much is a very British film, as personified by the suave, cool, and urbane hero who keeps a stiff upper lip throughout his ordeal. And quite an ordeal it is, as he finds himself hip-deep in a diplomatic brouhaha that could conceivably start another war. It all starts innocently enough, on a family vacation in Switzerland. Bob Lawrence (Leslie Banks), his wife Jill (Edna Best), and their daughter Betty (Nova Pilbeam) are having a grand old time, even enjoying the company of a Frenchman, Louis Bernard (Pierre Fresnay). Then Bernard is killed (in a wonderfully subtle way), and his dying words charge Bob to find a hidden document in his room and take it to the British Consul. The bad guys, led by Abbott (Peter Lorre, in his first English-speaking role), are right behind him, though, and prevent him from delivering the important message by kidnapping his little girl. The Lawrences return to Britain without Betty; unable to tell the authorities the truth, Bob sets out to find and rescue his little girl on his own and stop the planned assassination of an important diplomat if he can - but his daughter's safety comes first. The film builds to a wonderfully suspenseful scene as the assassin takes his place, but the movie doesn't end there. The completely satisfying conclusion comes only after a protracted shootout between the cops and the bad guys.

It's a wonderfully made film featuring a tight plot, a number of budget-friendly camera tricks (quite impressive for 1934), and great performances all around. Leslie Banks is wonderful as Bob Lawrence, but Peter Lorre pretty much steals the show. It has been many years since I saw the 1956 remake starring Jimmy Stewart and Doris Day, so I can't really compare the two versions of the film. Many Hitchcock fans have a special regard for the original, though, because this film provides us with a glimpse at the legend that is Hitchcock in the making. Even if you're not a Hitchcock fan (if that is even possible), watch it for Peter Lorre - he is nothing less than the icon of polite, soft-spoken villains.


4 out of 5 stars The young Hitchcock is peeping out of the egg   January 27, 2005
Jacques COULARDEAU (OLLIERGUES France)
6 out of 6 found this review helpful

It's probably not a great film, but it is an early creation by Hitchcock and we can already see some of his art coming out. The action has a rhythm that does not accept any slack moment. Every gesture, word or attitude of all actors are absolutely calculated to be meaningful. No waste of time, no waste of film. The story is meaningless in itself, but it was meaningful in 1934. The danger of a new war was coming and it took some courage to say so as soon as 1934, as soon as Hitler appeared. The role of Switzerland is here shown with clarity. It is a neutral country, hence a country where spies of all sorts can meet and settle their accounts. What's more, Hitchcock had a sense of humor. There are a couple of funny scenes at the beginning of the film that are quite simple and effective, but Hitchcock is already a master because it is when he makes us laugh at something that the plot thickens and the action jumps into gear. Humor is there to distract us and to make us be more surprised by the dramatic turn of events. There is also a certain distanciation between Hitchcock and the British. The scene where the poor father is trying to commuinicate with a German-speaking young Swiss cop, in English or in French, not understanding that it is German he needs is absolutely ironical. How can you pretend to be the masters of the world if you can't even communicate with people in the proper language ? And how can you keep the world safe if you can't even have some security in The Albert Hall where an assassin can enter, kill or try to kill and disappear ? And how can an assassin miss his target because one woman in the audience yells a warning ? Are assassins that emotional and influenceable ? The world is no longer what it used to be. But to apply this kind of humor in 1934 at the war danger that Hitler represented is quite amazing : it sure is a warning about what we could lose if we were not cautious, prudent, careful and vigilant : we could lose the possibility to just laugh at things, a greater loss than anything we could imagine.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU


4 out of 5 stars Early touches from the master   October 13, 2004
7 out of 10 found this review helpful

I started watching and was put off by the bad effects at the beginning, (close-ups of characters with superimposed backgrounds cutting to wide-angle stock footage of alpine scenery) but as the story unravels it gets better. It's ambitious in places- sometimes too much so.

The plot too is a bit dodgy- it starts off presumably at the Alpine Winter Olympics with the main characters' daughter (Nova Pilbeam) almost killing a French downhill skier by running in front of him whilst pursuing her errant dog- everyone laughs it off and lights up a smoke! Obviously crowd barriers weren't invented at the time?

The girl then proceeds to wander into a clay-pigeon shooting contest (is that in the Winter Olympics?) being held on the balcony of a hotel (?!) where she puts her mother (Edna Best) off her shot thus giving the contest to an obviously untrustworthy German.

The wife then goes off with her arm around the Frenchman- but it's all done with impeccable British panache and they all light up again and laugh.

But then things really kick off- the wife dances with the Frenchman and suddenly he's shot through the glass window before uttering some obscure warning (where have I seen that before?). Truly Hitchcockian.

The baddies were BADDIES in those days and easy to spot. Either Germanic or Eastern European. Peter Lorre is supreme and steals the show- a sympathetic suave character.

The little girl is then kidnapped to keep her parents quiet (it's all to do with an attempt on a foreign dignitary's life)- the topic of children being kidnapped is close to any parents heart- what would you do under the same circumstances?

The father (Leslie Banks) takes matters into his own hands and with the help of a bumbling side-kick 'Uncle' rescues her. It's quite touching really although as a dad he is be a bit hard on her at the end.

Along the way there's some comedy- after the comical 'Uncle' has his teeth unnecessarily extracted by a sinister dodgy dentist our hero tells him to "stay outside and keep your mouth shut".

Well, I didn't write it!

The plot often bypasses incidentals to get to the point - but it's always rivetting stuff.

The ending finishes with a bloodbath- the well armed insurrectionists against the good old unarmed British Bobbies (they couldh've done with the SAS in those days!). Thankfully they nip to the local army barracks for rifles and blitz the baddies.

There's a superb feminist ending- how many films even today finish like this?

Unfortunately on my copy the sound quality isn't tip top and there are no real extras.

www.pcprotech.co.uk
Navigation Links
Home
Services
Bespoke Systems
Webdesign
Contact
Broadband Speed Test
Remote Access
Computer Shop
Laptop Shop
Microsoft Office 2007
Norton Internet Security 2007 (PC)
EMC Retrospect 7.5 Pro (PC) - Back Up Software
Western Digital My Book PRO (inculdes retrospect)
Microsoft Windows Operating Systems
DVD-R
Flashpens

Memory Cards

LCD MONITORS